Harper’s steady-as-you-go vs Ignatieff’s big spending

The comparison between a Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition government led by Michael Ignatieff versus and a Conservative majority government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, couldn’t have been more stark with yesterday’s announcements.  

On May 2nd, 2011, Canadians will have to choose between a social spending government modelled on the Trudeau 1970s or the former Conservative government’s steady-as-you-go approach that has made Canada the envy of G7 nations.

As I wrote on March 27th, 2011, that by raising the corporate tax rate from its current 16.5% to 18%, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff would bite the very hand that feeds the economy. 

Ignatieff laid out the Liberal Party of Canada’s Red Book # 2 yesterday, which included a promise to give small businesses a break for hiring young people between the ages of 18 and 25.  A good idea in principle, it would, unfortunately, require raising the corporate tax rate to pay for it and all their other social program promises — which would completely cancel out the youth incentive benefits.

Moreover, there is some disagreement as to whether the corporate tax increases would even pay for all the social spending the Liberals are promising. Of course, we only need to remember Red Book # 1 — the Jean Chretien Liberals were going to “axe the tax” (the GST) and implement a national day care program — neither of which ever happened.  As John Ivison writes today, none of their ideas are original and few of the original ideas are sound.   

However, it’s the increased corporate taxes that would cripple the Canadian economy. They not only reduce competitiveness and job creation in large corporations, but in small and medium-sized businesses as well — the very backbone of our wealth generation.

I mean, why attack large corporations when they are the largest employers? Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that the government, with the opposition’s agreement, bailed out the auto manufacturing sector. Do those thousands upon thousands of well paid union jobs not count? 

Liberals just want to spend, spend, spend. They say it is just a question of priorities. Well,  at a time when the country can least afford it, in the midst of a global recession, you don’t pretend you will have money when you won’t. As Jack Mintz says, in terms of the $6 billion the Liberals say they will make from increasing corporate taxes, the emperor (Ignatieff) has no clothes!

As such, I agree with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, when he said on the CBC’s The National last evening that what the country needs is a steady-as-you-go fiscal approach and to implement social promises only when the deficit is gone.  

Hopefully, Canadians will choose stability and good money management on May 2nd and vote for their Conservative candidate.

Endnotes: (1) See also Blue Like You’s “Corporate Tax Cut Canard,” Hunter’s “Instant Gratification, and” N.B. Tory Gal‘s timely reflections. (2) I originally had a link to a Toronto Star column by Josh Ruben. However, I removed it after publishing because of the extremely offensive pro-Liberal, anti-Conservative government ad above the column. However, quotes by Catherine Swift, the President of the Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses, on the negative affects of increasing corporate taxes, can be found on this post as well.

5 thoughts on “Harper’s steady-as-you-go vs Ignatieff’s big spending

  1. All parties want to buy a new TV.
    CPC will wait until it can be afforded, Libs will put it on the credit card, NDs want the tax payer to buy it (it’s a right to own one) and the Greens arn’t sure what the “footprint” is or what it will do for them but everyone else has one (the bloc only want 1 channel).

    Let’s wait until we can afford it!


  2. Pingback: Stephen Taylor- Election 2011 « Newsbeat1

  3. Iggy has been given pretty much a free ride on the “jets” issue; he’s been milking it for all he can and has never made it clear, or been asked to make it clear, whether or not he was committed to replacing our current fleet in a timely fashion. Think about it, folks, he may well have no choice but to commit to a multibillion spending program in a couple of years and just about nobody in the media is asking him what the plan is nor how he’d fund it. Keep in mind that he’s committed to using the pool of money for that to pay for his various social spending projects. I’m a little surprised the Con warroom isn’t pointing that out.


  4. As the Globe put it the other day, Harper says we can have dessert but only if we eat our broccoli first.

    Personally, I hate broccoli. But I get it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.